SC/ST Act Can’t Be Used If Person Not Abused In Public: Karnataka High Court


SC/ST Act Can't Be Used If Person Not Abused In Public: Karnataka High Court

The court docket stated that the hurling of casteist abuse should be in a public place to make use of SC/ST act.


The Excessive Courtroom of Karnataka has stated that for offences beneath the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, the hurling of casteist abuse should be in a public place.

It quashed a case pending in opposition to an individual because it discovered that the alleged abuse was made in a basement of a constructing, the place the sufferer and his co-workers alone had been current.

Within the alleged incident which occurred in 2020, Rithesh Pias made the casteist abuse in opposition to Mohan on the basement of a constructing the place he was working with the others. All the employees had been employed by the constructing proprietor Jayakumar R Nair.

Justice M Nagaprasanna, in his verdict on June 10, famous: “Two components will emerge from a studying of the aforesaid statements– one being, the basement of the constructing was not a spot of public view and two, solely individuals who declare to be current had been the complainants and different workers of Jayakumar R.Nair or buddies of the complainants.

“Hurling of abuses is clearly not in a spot of public view or a public place for the Act to be get attracted within the case at hand,” the court docket stated.

Additional, the court docket famous that there have been different components within the case. The accused Rithesh Pias had a dispute with the constructing proprietor Jayakumar R Nair and had obtained a keep in opposition to the development of the constructing.

The court docket concluded that Nair was firing at Pias on the “shoulder of his worker (Johan).” The court docket stated the problem of the dispute between the 2 “can’t be brushed apart because it demonstrates a transparent hyperlink within the chain of occasions. Due to this fact, the registration of crime itself suffers from need of bona fides.” Within the Classes Courtroom in Mangaluru the place the case was pending, other than the Atrocities Act, Pias was additionally charged beneath Part 323 (Voluntarily Inflicting Harm) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The Excessive Courtroom dismissed the costs additionally by saying, “For an offence punishable beneath Part 323 IPC there needs to be harm induced within the squabble.” Nevertheless on this case, Mohan’s “wound certificates exhibits a easy scratch mark on the fore-arm and one other scratch mark on the chest. Bleeding will not be what’s indicated. Due to this fact, easy scratch marks can not turn into offence beneath Part 323 of the IPC,” the judgement stated.

Quashing the case pending earlier than the decrease court docket, the Excessive Courtroom stated, “Within the mild of the afore-quoted info, when the fundamental components of the offence are lacking, then allowing such proceedings to proceed and to compel the petitioner to face the rigmarole of legal trial can be completely unjustified, resulting in abuse of the method of legislation.”

(Apart from the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)



Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button
%d bloggers like this: